Skip to content

Book: AI Atlas: Power, Politics and Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence: 2089 (Traces and Signals)

01/05/2024
*


Price: 25,90€ - € 24,60
(as of Nov 02, 2024 19:14:09 UTC – Details)

Meaning Creation in Artificial Intelligence

Who are the agents involved in the creation of meaning in Artificial Intelligence? Are these results scientifically indisputable truths? Who benefits if AI solutions are taken as absolute references in cutting-edge technology? What cost does it have for individuals? And for the planet?

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

This work is the result of more than ten years of research on large-scale data extraction, both the material cost of it - exploitation of rare earth mines, endangered trees, subsidized resources such as water or electricity, exploitation of labor―, as well as the strategies underlying the dominance of a technology that perpetuates power and its social and cultural biases.

A puzzle where each piece is dissected and analyzed with scientific thoroughness; a fascinating map about the greedy exploitation of natural resources, workers treated without scruples, a selection of information that was biased from the moment it was collected, and a pact between states and private companies that ignore the responsibilities that come with extraction and exploitation. processing of private information lacking a context.

In this book, the author offers us a pleasant explanation of why the Artificial Intelligence It is neither intelligent nor artificial.

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Ned Ediciones; No. 1 edition (April 25, 2023)
Language ‏ : ‎ Spanish
Softcover ‏ : ‎ 448 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 841940702X
ISBN-13 : ‎ 978-8419407023
Product weight ‏ : ‎ 597 g
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 15 x 2.8 x 21 cm

READ MORE ARTICLES ABOUT: AI Books in Spanish.

READ THE PREVIOUS POST: Book: CHATGPT to Create Content: A Guide to Boost your Brand with Artificial Intelligence.

Related Posts

Comments are closed.

Comments (76)

It's interesting how this article touches on the topic of power and politics in AI. But don't you think the ethical impact of AI on our society has been overlooked? We talk about meaning-making in AI, but what does that really mean to the average individual?

Totally agree. AI has a giant ethical impact and is often overlooked.

Seriously, I don't understand why everyone is so obsessed with AI. Do you really think robots will take over the world? Regarding the AI ​​Atlas, it seems to me that it is only fueling fear and paranoia. And as for Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence, isn't that something we humans should be doing instead of machines?

AI does not seek to replace us, but to make our lives easier. Why fear progress?

I'm really intrigued by how this AI Atlas book seems to focus on the power and politics of AI, but what about meaning-making in AI? Don't you think it's equally important to understand how AI interprets and creates meaning in our data? That could be a game changer!

Clear! But understanding the power and politics of AI helps us control its interpretation of data.

The truth is that this article about AI Atlas has got me thinking. Should we fear AI or embrace it as a necessary tool for our evolution? And as for Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence, isn't that a bit contradictory? Can a machine really create meaning?

AI is our creation, to fear it is to fear ourselves. You can create meaning, why not?

Interesting read on AI Atlas. But don't you think AI is given too much credit in terms of creating meaning? I have always thought that the creation of meaning depends more on human interpretation than on the technology itself. Does anyone else think the same?

Totally agree. AI is just a tool, the meaning will always be human.

I think this article on AI Atlas and Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence has opened up a really interesting debate. Anyone else wondering how AI is affecting our geopolitical and environmental outlook? It's fascinating and a little scary at the same time! And not to mention, how does meaning-making apply in this context? I'd love to hear what others think!

Completely agree. AI is not only changing our daily lives, but also global politics.

I really enjoyed this analysis on the AI ​​Atlas. I think the discussion on Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence is a bit biased. Don't you think we should give more importance to how AI can help solve current environmental problems instead of just focusing on its planetary costs?

I understand that AI has a political and planetary impact, but has its effect on society at an individual level been considered? How will decisions made by AI affect our personal freedoms and rights? On the other hand, Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence sounds intriguing, how does AI determine what is meaningful?

AI can limit our freedoms if not regulated. As for creating meaning, it's up to the programmer.

It seems to me that this article underestimates the importance of ethics in AI. Shouldn't we talk more about how decisions are made and who controls them? Furthermore, meaning creation in artificial intelligence is not a simple topic. Is it possible for machines to truly understand human context?

Interesting article, but I would like to pose a question: How can equity in the use of AI be ensured when the planetary costs are so high? Also, on the creation of meaning in artificial intelligence, don't we run the risk of humanizing these machines too much?

The cost is high, but the equity is invaluable. Humanizing AI is perhaps what makes us human.

Don't you think that the AI ​​Atlas is a gem of technological literature? But he left me thinking, how is meaning-making actually achieved in artificial intelligence? Isn't that simply a reflection of our own human interpretations and biases? What a mess!

Sure, AI is a mirror of our interpretations, but isn't that how we all learn?

I wonder if the book AI Atlas: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence: 2089 sufficiently addresses the topic of Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence. Although it is true that politics and economics are crucial issues, it would be interesting to also delve into how AI creates sense and meaning.

Totally agree. AI is not only economics and politics, it is also philosophy and semantics.

Interesting insight into the Creation of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence. But don't you think the human aspect is being neglected in all this? Where is the ethical responsibility in the use of AI? Furthermore, the AI ​​Atlas mentions planetary costs, but are we really prepared to bear them?

Totally agree, the human and ethical approach in AI is crucial. Who will bear the planetary costs?

Interesting article, but don't you think we are giving too much credit to AI in terms of creating meaning? AI can process and analyze data at a scale that we cannot, but it cannot understand the meaning of that data in the same way that a human can.

Totally disagree. I think you greatly underestimate the potential of AI.

After reading the AI ​​Atlas article, I was wondering, does anyone else think we are underestimating the planetary costs of AI? Sometimes it seems that we only focus on progress, but forget the environmental impact. And about Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence, isn't that a bit subjective?

It's interesting how the book AI Atlas delves into the political aspects and planetary costs of AI. However, I believe that the Creation of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence is not sufficiently explored. Shouldn't we also consider how AI interprets and understands the world, just as we do?

Totally agree. AI must learn to understand and not just process data.

Interesting article about the AI ​​Atlas. But don't you think that artificial intelligence is being given too much power? Instead of focusing on the planetary costs, we should focus more on how AI is changing meaning-making in our society. This could have deeper impacts than environmental aspects.

Completely agree, we are giving up too much control to AI. It's disturbing.

The focus of the AI ​​Atlas book is interesting. I wonder if we are really considering the planetary costs of AI. Wouldn't it be wiser to invest in greener technologies before promoting one that could be harmful to our planet? And as for Meaning Creation in Artificial Intelligence, don't we run the risk of humanizing AI too much?

Interesting article, but I wonder, wouldn't we be giving too much power to AI? Something tells me that we are not sufficiently considering the planetary costs mentioned in the AI ​​Atlas. Furthermore, couldn't the creation of meaning in artificial intelligence lead to a loss of humanity? Just thoughts that come to mind.

Interesting article, but I wonder, aren't we giving too much power to AI? Planetary costs are mentioned in the book AI Atlas. Shouldn't we be more worried about this? And about the Creation of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence, aren't we losing the true meaning of being human?

AI is a tool, not a master. The meaning of being human is to adapt and overcome challenges.

Interesting article, but don't you think that sometimes we overvalue artificial intelligence? Don't get me wrong, I see his potential, but I also worry that we give him more credit than he deserves. And what about the planetary cost they mention? Shouldn't we consider more the ecological consequences of AI?

I agree. AI is useful, but we cannot ignore its ecological effects.

I find it fascinating how this article approaches AI from a political and planetary cost point of view. But don't you think we should discuss more about how AI can help solve environmental problems instead of just focusing on costs? It's a perspective that I feel is missing in many discussions.

Don't you think that this book Atlas of AI makes us think about who really controls artificial intelligence? We are not just talking about costs, but about power and politics. And about the Creation of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence, isn't it that we are giving too much credit to AI? I was just thinking about it.

Totally agree. AI is a tool, not a god. We should control it ourselves.

Interesting article about the AI ​​Atlas. But don't you think there needs to be more focus on how AI is shaping our political environment? Also, Meaning Creation in Artificial Intelligence seems like an abstract concept. Wouldn't it be more useful to discuss practical applications for the common citizen?

Totally agree. We need to discuss more about AI in politics and its daily practical impact.

Interesting read! But don't you think the AI ​​Atlas book focuses too much on the planetary costs of AI and not enough on how we can mitigate these costs? On the other hand, Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence seems to address this issue in a more balanced way.

I think AI Atlas is more realistic and calls us to reflect. It's not all about mitigating costs.

Does anyone else think that Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence was not addressed enough in the AI ​​Atlas book? It seemed to me that they focused too much on the political aspect and costs, but left out the true meaning and purpose of AI.

Totally agree. AI is not just politics and costs, it needs more depth!

I think this article raises some interesting reflections on the role of AI in our society. But what about the ethics behind meaning-making in AI? Shouldn't we be more concerned about who is programming these meaning-making mechanisms and what agenda they may have?

I totally agree, ethics in AI is fundamental. Who decides what is right or wrong?

Hello everyone! I find the discussion of the power and politics of AI in this book very interesting. But don't you think we should focus more on how AI can help us on a daily basis? Perhaps meaning creation in AI needs to be addressed in more depth. I look forward to your opinions!

I read the article on AI Atlas: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence: 2089 and it made me think. Don't you think AI could redefine politics at a global level? And about Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence, couldn't this alter our perception of what is real? What times we live in!

Interesting article about the AI ​​Atlas. However, I wonder, does the book really address the planetary costs of AI? It seems to me that there is a lot of talk about the benefits of AI, but the negative impact it can have on our planet is ignored. Furthermore, what exactly do we mean by meaning creation in AI? Isn't that subjective?

The negative impact of AI is undeniable, but its meaning-making is purely interpretive.

This article about the AI ​​Atlas made me think. Don't you think that the creation of meaning in Artificial Intelligence could lead us to new ways of understanding the world? But at what cost? Are we willing to take the risks posed by AI and the possibility of losing control?

Totally agree. AI offers possibilities, but at what cost? Are we ready to take it on?

Interesting analysis on the AI ​​Atlas, but I wonder, isn't it overlooking the discussion about ethics in Artificial Intelligence? And on Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence, wouldn't it be more relevant to explore how AI can generate its own meanings instead of simply imitating ours?

This AI Atlas looks interesting, but does it really address how AI is or is not creating meaning? I wonder if AI can generate authentic meaning instead of just replicating existing patterns. Isn't it, after all, our human experiences that give meaning to things? Could a machine really match that?

AI can create meaning, but it will never match the human experience. Machines don't feel!

Don't you think the AI ​​Atlas book deals too superficially with meaning-making in AI? I mean, instead of just focusing on power and costs, you should delve into how AI can generate real understanding and not just imitate human learning.

Superficial? I disagree. AI cannot generate understanding, it only imitates. The book is realistic.

This article on the AI ​​Atlas really got me thinking. Don't you think that meaning creation in AI could be a double-edged sword? On the one hand, it can solve complex problems, but on the other, it could lead to the manipulation of human perception. Where is the balance then?

The article on AI Atlas left me thinking, don't you think we are putting too much weight on AI, forgetting about human abilities? Furthermore, I don't know if the creation of meaning in AI can really be comparable to the complexity of human thought. What do you think?

Interesting article, but I wonder if the AI ​​Atlas book adequately covers the environmental cost of AI. On the other hand, Meaning Creation in Artificial Intelligence is a very profound topic. Do you think AI can really create its own meaning or does it just interpret it?

AI is only as green as its creators. And yes, you can create meaning, not just interpret it.

I think the article raises a good point about AI Atlas: Power, Politics and Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence: 2089. However, I would like to discuss how Meaning Making in Artificial Intelligence really impacts our daily lives. Is it as drastic a change as the author suggests?

Totally agree. I think AI is still far from changing our lives drastically.

Interesting article about the AI ​​Atlas. I would like to question the concept of Meaning Creation in Artificial Intelligence. Aren't we simply projecting our own conceptions of meaning onto these digital entities? Wouldn't it be more accurate to talk about data interpretation instead of meaning creation? What do you think?

It's interesting what you talk about in the AI ​​Atlas article, but don't you think we should be more concerned about how AI is redefining meaning-making? We seem to be forgetting how AI affects our perception of reality. I'd love to see a debate on this!

Good morning! I found the AI ​​Atlas topic interesting, which discusses the power, politics, and planetary costs of artificial intelligence. I wonder, to what extent will meaning-making in AI truly reflect our human complexity? Hard to predict, right? What do you think?

Good morning! I believe that AI will never be able to fully reflect our human complexity. We are unique and unrepeatable.

Interesting article, but I wonder if we are really considering the ethical and moral costs of AI. Shouldn't we prioritize creating meaning in artificial intelligence before moving forward blindly? Not all that glitters is gold, friends. Something to reflect on.

Totally agree. Ethics should not be an afterthought in AI. Let's wake up!

Was anyone else surprised by the way this article addressed the topic of meaning-making in AI? I think they overlooked the importance of the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Shouldn't we be more concerned about how AI can affect our planet in 2089?

Totally agree, but we must remember that AI can also help solve environmental problems.

Interesting reflection on AI Atlas: Power, Politics and Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence: 2089. But shouldn't we also consider how AI is changing the way we see the world? Isn't meaning-making in artificial intelligence a fundamental shift in our understanding of what reality is?

Totally agree, AI is reformulating our perception of reality. Let's wake up!

I have read the article about the book Atlas of AI and creating meaning in AI. I wonder, shouldn't we focus more on how AI can lead us to an era of abundance instead of fearing its consequences? AI has the potential to positively transform our world, if we handle it correctly.