Skip to content

Book: Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory

27/04/2024
*


Price: 103,99€ - € 52,85
(as of Nov 10, 2024 07:13:09 UTC – Details)

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

«Creativity plays an important role in the advancement of computing, great ideas are built on a foundation of experience and practical knowledge.»

"This book presents programming techniques useful in both AI projects and more conventional software engineering efforts."

"My main goal is to entertain, introduce new technologies, and provide reusable software modules for the computer programmer who enjoys using programs as models to solve difficult and interesting problems."

"If this book manages to entertain, then it will certainly educate as well."

"I developed the example programs on a Macintosh using the Macintosh Common LISP development system by capturing screen images while the example programs were running."

"All programs in this book are copyrighted by Mark Watson."

Buy this book now Artificial Intelligence in English!

READ MORE ARTICLES ABOUT: AI Books in English.

READ THE PREVIOUS POST: Book: ETERNITY: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ME.

Related Posts

Comments are closed.

Comments (36)

Does anyone else think that this book, although interesting, could delve deeper into the practical application of LISP in AI? Don't get me wrong, theory is essential, but a balance between theory and practice would have been more helpful, especially for beginners in the field. Still, it's a good read.

The truth is that the article on the book Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory is quite interesting. But don't you think that artificial intelligence and neural networks are overtaking chaos theory in terms of relevance? Wouldn't it be more useful to focus on them instead of trying to balance both?

Does anyone else think that chaos theory and neural networks are too complex to be covered in a LISP module? I'm not saying it's not possible, but I feel like maybe we're trying to force things too much into a language that wasn't designed for that. What do you think?

I think being limited by the programming language is outdated thinking. Challenge your skills!

Does anyone else think that the book Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory might be a little outdated? Although I recognize their historical importance, I believe that the theories of artificial intelligence and neural networks have evolved greatly since their publication. Wouldn't a book that addresses current trends be more useful?

Obsolete? Maybe. But understanding the fundamentals never goes out of style. Don't dismiss the past so quickly!

Did anyone else feel a little overwhelmed by the combination of LISP and chaos theory in this book? I feel like the author tried to chew on too much at once. I'm not against interdisciplinarity, but perhaps a softer approach is needed. Too much to digest!

Totally agree, too much LISP and chaos, it compromised the clarity of the book.

I have been reading about Book: Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. Does anyone else think we should have more discussions about how LISP is used in AI today? It seems like we're ignoring its potential amid the Python and R hype. Opinions?

Totally agree. LISP is the underrated grandfather of AI. Wake up, Python and R lovers!

Does anyone else think it's a bit ironic to talk about LISP in the era of neural networks and chaos theory? Who would have thought that a programming language from the 50s would still have relevance in these advanced topics. It's amazing how foundations last over time!

Clear! And we still use wheels, invented in 3500 BC Age does not detract!

Interesting article on Common LISP Modules: AI in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. But don't you think we should ask ourselves how these modules really connect to chaos theory? It is mentioned, but not discussed in much depth. I mean, wouldn't it be fascinating to see how these two theories intertwine? Let's open that conversation!

Does anyone else think that this book could open new horizons in artificial intelligence if applied correctly? I wonder if neural network and chaos theories could change the way we view LISP modules. Wouldn't it be interesting to see how this plays out?

Totally agree. The potential of AI is vastly underestimated. It's time to rethink LISP!

Interesting article about the book Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. But don't you think that the role of classical AI theories compared to neural networks and chaos theory is underestimated? Sometimes old can still be relevant, right?

Completely agree. Sometimes classic bases make all the difference. Let's not underestimate the past!

Really interesting what this article raises about Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. But I wonder, how can we apply these abstract concepts to real, everyday problems? Is there a way to translate chaos theory into something practical in the field of artificial intelligence?

Chaos theory can definitely drive AI algorithms to predict unexpected behaviors. It's a matter of creativity!

Interesting article about the Book: Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. But don't you think that AI and neural networks are already surpassing chaos theory in terms of practical applicability? What a crazy technological advance!

Does anyone else think this book reaffirms the relevance of LISP in modern AI? Although there has been a lot of talk about Python and R, LISP remains fundamental to artificial intelligence. Additionally, with the growing importance of neural networks and chaos theory, I believe the value of LISP will only increase. What do you think?

Totally agree. LISP is and will continue to be the soul of AI.

Interesting article about the Book: Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. Has anyone thought about how these theories could be applied to solving complex social problems? I don't know, I feel like sometimes we get caught up in the technical and forget the real impact.

Totally agree. We need to unite technology and humanity to solve real problems.

This article about Book: Common LISP Modules: AI in the Age of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory left me thinking. Does the author really believe that Common LISP is still relevant in the era of Python and R? I would like to see more arguments in this regard.

LISP, like every language, has its place. Don't underestimate its power in AI and chaos theory.

Does anyone else think this book might be a little dated? I mean, artificial intelligence has come a long way since chaos theory and neural networks. Wouldn't it be more useful now to have a focus on deep learning and quantum artificial intelligence? Just a reflection.

Age does not detract from value. Deep learning and quantum AI have roots here.

Is anyone else wondering if this book, Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory, might be too dated to be relevant today? AI and neural networks have evolved tremendously since it was written. Maybe we should focus more on current developments. What do you think?

Age does not diminish your relevance, it only changes your perspective. Don't dismiss the past so quickly!

This article about Book: Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory makes me wonder, isn't AI already chaotic enough without adding elements of chaos theory? Aren't we overcomplicating things? Or is this complexity necessary to advance this field? Let's see what you guys think.

Complexity is the mother of evolution. Without chaos, there is no advancement in AI.

Don't you think that the book Common LISP Modules: Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory falls short when talking about the ethical implications of using AI? It seems to me that you should delve deeper into the social impact of these technologies.

Short? It's a programming book, not philosophy! Stop looking for ethics where there are none.

Interesting article about the Book: Common LISP Modules: AI in the Era of Neural Networks and Chaos Theory. Don't you think that artificial intelligence will drastically change our way of living in the coming decades? And, although LISP was crucial in its beginnings, don't you think that other languages ​​like Python are now more relevant in the field of AI?

Totally agree. Python leads AI today, but let's not underestimate LISP's legacy.