Skip to content

Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health

28/04/2024
*


Price: 41,60€ - € 25,73
(as of Nov 05, 2024 19:46:08 UTC – Details)

AI for Good Summer Lectures, Lecture 1: Poverty

EDITORIAL NOTE

Discover how AI leaders and researchers are using AI to transform the world for the better

In AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, a team of veteran Microsoft AI researchers offers an insightful and fascinating discussion of how one of the world's most recognized software companies is tackling intractable social problems with power. of the Artificial Intelligence (AI). In the book, you'll see real-world examples of researchers using AI with replicable methods and reusable AI code to inspire your own applications.

The authors also provide:

Easy-to-follow, non-technical explanations of what AI is and how it works Examples of using AI for scientists working on climate change mitigation, showing how AI can better analyze data without human bias, remedy pattern recognition deficits, and use satellite and other data on a scale never seen before so that policymakers can make informed decisions Real applications of AI in humanitarian actions, whether in accelerating disaster relief with more accurate data for first responders or in help address populations that have experienced adversity with examples of how analytics is being used to promote inclusionA deep focus on AI in healthcare where it is improving provider productivity and the patient experience, reducing costs of care per capita and increasing access, equity, and outcomes of care Discussions on the future of AI in the field of organizations and social benefit efforts Beyond the work of the authors, collaborators, and researchers featured in the book, AI For Good begins with a foreword from Microsoft Vice President and President Brad Smith. There, Smith details the rationale behind the creation of Microsoft and the continued investment in the AI ​​for Good Lab. The vision is one of hope, with AI saving lives in disasters, improving healthcare globally, and Microsoft's mission to make sure the benefits of AI are available to everyone.

An essential guide to impactful social change with Artificial Intelligence, AI for Good is a must-have resource for technical and non-technical professionals interested in the social potential of AI, as well as policymakers, regulators, NGO professionals, and nonprofit volunteers.

Publisher ‏ : ‎ John Wiley & Sons Inc (April 9, 2024)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 432 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1394235879
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1394235872
Product weight ‏ : ‎ 612 g
Dimensions: 16 x 2.79 x 23.37 cm
Buy this book now! Artificial Intelligence in English!

READ MORE ARTICLES ABOUT: AI Books in English.

READ THE PREVIOUS POST: Book: Artificial Neural Networks: Principles and Applications.

Related Posts

Comments are closed.

Comments (102)

Interesting article about Book: AI for Good. Is anyone else wondering if AI can really be used for sustainability and humanitarian actions without falling into the wrong hands and being used for malicious purposes? Is there any regulation to prevent this, or are we just playing with fire here?

I share your concerns. Without proper regulation, any technology can be a double-edged sword.

Does anyone else think that the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health is focused on an overly idealistic future? I mean, yes, AI can help, but it can also create new ethical and privacy problems. Shouldn't we focus more on solving these issues before dreaming of a perfect world thanks to AI?

Idealist or not, why not address both issues simultaneously? AI is the future, whether we like it or not.

I just read about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. Has anyone else wondered if AI could really replace humans in humanitarian actions? Are we not moving away from the very essence of what it means to be human? Where do we draw the line?

AI does not replace, it enhances. Humanity is evolution, why fear the future?

Regarding the article in the book AI for Good, I find the point of view interesting, but don't you think that sometimes we get carried away by the utopian idea of ​​AI solving all our problems? A more critical focus on how AI could impact the most vulnerable people in terms of privacy and security would be beneficial.

Totally agree. AI is not a magic solution, it can also be a threat.

Does anyone else feel like we're relying too much on AI to solve our problems? Of course, AI for Good sounds great, but aren't we evading our human responsibility by relying on technology for sustainability and humanitarian action? It's like we're putting a patch on it, not a real solution! What do you guys think?

After reading the article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, I wonder if AI could really replace human intuition and experience in areas like health. Don't you think there will always be a limit to technology, no matter how advanced it is?

Technology has no limits, only those that we impose on it. AI can even surpass our intuition.

Interesting article about Book: AI for Good. But don't you think it's a bit ambiguous to say that AI is used for good? Who defines what is good? Couldn't AI be used wrongly under the guise of good? Ethics in AI is a thorny topic, don't you think?

Totally agree. Kindness is subjective. AI is not inherently good or bad, it depends on the use.

I really appreciate the focus of this article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. But don't you think there should be more talk about the possible ethical implications of AI? Although promising, there are still many unanswered questions. What do you think?

Totally agree. AI ethics is a crucial topic that cannot be ignored.

Interesting article about Book: AI for Good, but don't you think AI could also be used in a negative way? Not much is mentioned about how to control its misuse. Furthermore, how do we guarantee accessibility and equity in its implementation? I await your thoughts!

Totally agree. We need clear regulations to prevent abuses and ensure fairness.

This article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health made me think, wouldn't it be great if AI was also used to improve education? It could personalize learning and potentially close achievement gaps. Does anyone know if there is ongoing research into this? I would love to know more!

I truly believe that this book, AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, gives us a much-needed vision of how we can apply AI to improve our world. But how do we ensure that AI is not used for evil? Is it enough to regulate it? And what about countries that do not have the resources to implement AI? This needs to be discussed!

I actually found the topic of Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health fascinating. But do you really believe that AI can contribute significantly to sustainability and humanitarian action? Or are we simply falling into excess technological optimism?

Of course! AI is already contributing. Technological optimism is necessary for innovation.

Interesting article about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. I wonder, how can we ensure that AI is effectively used for good and not evil? Is there any regulatory framework in this regard? Could we be opening a Pandora's box with AI? I look forward to reading your opinions.

The regulation of AI is essential, but so is its responsible use. Let's not fear technology, let's master it.

Does anyone else think that this AI for Good book is not giving enough credence to the negative implications of AI on sustainability? I mean, sure, it may have applications in humanitarian action and health, but what about the security and privacy risks? We need a more balanced approach.

Did anyone notice that the book Book: AI for Good focuses more on sustainability and humanitarian action and less on health? Don't you think AI can be a key tool to improve healthcare? Why wasn't that area explored more in the book? Just a reflection.

Totally agree, AI in healthcare deserves more exploration. Maybe in the next edition?

Don't you think that the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health will change our perception of AI? It not only talks about how AI can improve our lives, but also teaches us how it can be an effective tool for sustainable development and humanitarian action. Anyway, isn't this the future we all want?

Interesting article about the book AI for Good. But don't you think that AI is sometimes overly romanticized? Can we really trust that artificial intelligence will always be used for good and not darker purposes? I would like to see more discussion about the ethics of AI.

Totally agree. Not everything is rosy with AI, it can also be a double-edged sword.

I find it amazing how AI can contribute to sustainability and humanitarian action. But isn't there a risk of AI making biased decisions based on the data it was trained on? Could that cause more harm than good? It would be interesting to delve deeper into this topic.

Totally agree. AI is a tool, not infallible. Its effectiveness depends on how it is used.

Is anyone else wondering if this AI for good really considers the ethical implications of its use? I mean, it's great that it applies to sustainability and humanitarian action, but what happens if it's used incorrectly? Not everything is black and white in the world of AI.

Totally agree. Ethics in AI is a complex topic and must be seriously discussed.

Hello everyone! I think the approach of the book AI for Good is great. I wonder, don't you think that sometimes we put too much emphasis on AI to solve humanitarian and sustainability problems, when we should also focus our efforts on changing human behaviors? Just a thought!

Hello everyone! Don't you find it fascinating how AI can positively impact sustainability and human well-being? Although, I wonder, how accessible will these technologies be to the most vulnerable communities? Are we not at risk of increasing the digital divide? I'd love to hear your thoughts!

Totally agree! But shouldn't we focus on bridging the digital divide first?

I totally agree with the idea in the book that AI can be a powerful tool for sustainability. But don't you think we should be more concerned about the potential negative repercussions of AI? Aren't we leaving aside potential risks in favor of promised benefits?

Without a doubt, risks exist. But isn't it worse to ignore the potential of AI for sustainability?

I would really like to discuss the applicability of AI in humanitarian actions that the book mentions. Don't you think that the implementation of AI could create a bias or barrier for those who do not have access to advanced technology? How do we guarantee inclusion in this technological advance?

AI can create barriers, true, but it can also break down many. The challenge is in our will to democratize it.

After reading the article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, I am left wondering, is it possible that AI can really replace human judgment in emergency situations? Or are we falling into overdependence on technology?

I have read about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health and I have a question. There is a lot of talk about how AI can help with sustainability and humanitarian action, but don't you think this could lead to technological dependency and job loss? Where do we draw the line? A topic to debate, friends.

Interesting point of view, but isn't it better to evolve and adapt than to stay stagnant?

Interesting article about Book: AI for Good. But don't you think that AI, although it promotes sustainability and humanitarian action, can be harmful to mental health? With all this automation, aren't we forgetting the importance of human interactions?

Has anyone noticed that the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health does not sufficiently address the topic of ethics in AI? Don't you think we should consider more the ethical implications of using AI in such sensitive areas as health and humanitarian action?

This article on Book: AI for Good is quite interesting. But don't you think we should be a little more cautious about relying so heavily on AI, even for issues of sustainability and humanitarian action? Technology can fail, and then what? Humans must remain relevant in the process.

Totally agree. AI is useful, but it should not replace human judgment.

Does anyone else think this book on AI could be a survival guide for the future? I see that there is great potential in AI for sustainability and human well-being. But what about the ethical implications? Shouldn't we be more worried about that?

Completely agree, ethical debate is essential. Who will control this AI in the future?

Did anyone else notice that the AI ​​for Good book focuses more on sustainability and humanitarian action, but not as much on health? I think there is a lot of potential in AI for health that remains unexplored. Simply a reflection!

Totally agree. AI has great potential in health that has yet to be discovered.

Interesting article about Book: AI for Good. I wonder, are we really ready to delegate sustainability and humanitarian action tasks to AI? Don't we risk dehumanizing processes that require a human touch? On the other hand, how accessible is this technology for people in developing countries?

AI is just a tool, it does not replace human empathy. Responsible developers are key.

Interesting article about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. Does anyone else think that AI can be a double-edged sword in sustainability issues? On the one hand, it could help solve problems, but on the other hand, the energy consumption of AI is worrying. How do we balance this? Ideas?

Really, it is a challenge. But isn't progress always a balance between risk and reward?

I'm really curious how AI can be applied in sustainability and humanitarian action. But don't you think we should also worry about the ethical risks that AI can bring? For example, manipulating data or making decisions without human supervision.

Totally agree. AI offers solutions, but it also raises important ethical dilemmas. We must be vigilant!

Does anyone else think that AI in sustainability and humanitarian action is a double-edged sword? Yes, it can help solve urgent problems, but it can also create technological dependence and increase the digital divide. Shouldn't we focus on more accessible solutions before jumping into AI?

AI is a tool, not the problem. It is our responsibility to use it wisely.

After reading the article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, I wonder, can AI really help solve sustainability and humanitarian action problems? Don't we first need to resolve the ethical issues surrounding its use? I'm not against it, but I think the discussion should be deeper.

Totally agree, without a solid ethical foundation, AI can cause more problems than solutions.

Does anyone else think that this book AI for Good does not put enough emphasis on the potential risks of AI in sustainability and humanitarian action? I mean, it's great that they're exploring the positive applications, but we should also be alert to the potential abuses of these technologies, right?

Totally agree. This book needs a more critical analysis of AI.

Interesting article, but don't you think that sometimes AI is too idealized? Yes, it can be useful in sustainability and humanitarian action, but what about the potential threats to privacy? What if it falls into the wrong hands? We cannot ignore these ethical dilemmas.

Does anyone else think that AI applied in sustainability and humanitarian action can be a double-edged sword? Yes, it can help solve problems, but it can also lead to over-reliance on technology. Could we be creating bigger problems by trying to solve smaller ones?

Totally agree. Technological dependency can be a trap. Moderation above all!

Don't you think we sometimes forget that AI can also be misused? This book AI for Good talks about its applications in sustainability, humanitarian action and health, but what about the negative uses? We cannot close our eyes to this.

Totally agree. AI is a tool, not a guarantee of ethics. We must be alert.

Don't you think that the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health presents an overly optimistic view of AI? Wouldn't we be ignoring the potential risks of mass automation and data privacy? I would like to see more balance in these types of discussions.

Sure, AI has its risks. But isn't it better to explore its positive potential rather than fear it?

Don't you think that AI in sustainability and humanitarian action can be a double-edged sword? While it can help solve big problems, it can also be misused. I am concerned about the ethical control behind this. Who decides what is good?

Totally agree. But isn't that the case with all technologies? Ethics is a constant challenge.

Don't you think that the use of AI in humanitarian and health actions could be a double-edged sword? Yes, it can help optimize resources and increase efficiency, but it also risks dehumanizing processes that require empathy and human judgment. Not to mention data privacy… What do you think?

AI does not dehumanize, it amplifies our capacity. Privacy is a matter of regulation, not technology.

Interesting article, but shouldn't we also talk about the possible disadvantages of AI? Not everything is rosy. I wonder if the book addresses the potential risks of AI, for example lack of privacy or displaced human jobs. Has anyone read it and can shed some light on this?

Guys, don't you think this AI for Good book could be an essential tool for today's students? It argues that AI can be used for sustainability and humanitarian action. However, shouldn't you also discuss the possible risks of over-reliance on AI? Just a thought.

Interesting article, but I wonder, how can we ensure that AI is effectively used for good? I mean, in a world full of corruption, how do we ensure that these advances are not misused? Is there any type of regulation in this field?

This article about Book: AI for Good made me think… Are we really prepared for the ethical implications that AI entails in sustainability and humanitarian action? Can we trust AI to make decisions that affect human health? It's an interesting discussion.

I just read the article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. Don't you think AI can be a double-edged sword? On the one hand, it can help in sustainability and humanitarian actions, but on the other hand, it could be used for not so noble purposes. Where is the guarantee that it will always be used for good?

Does anyone else believe that the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health could give rise to a new wave of techno-optimism? I think it gives a very positive view of AI, but what about the risks and challenges? We can't ignore them, right?

Does anyone else believe that AI has the potential to be a powerful tool for good, but can also be dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands? The book AI for Good highlights the positive applications, but we must not forget the possible risks. We could be opening Pandora's box!

This article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health got me thinking. Don't you think AI could also be misused? If it falls into the wrong hands, it can be dangerous. How is that regulated? How do we ensure it is only used for good? I don't want to be negative, but it's something worth considering.

I totally agree, but any technology can be misused. The challenge is in regulation.

Don't you think that this book AI for Good is overly idealizing the role of AI in sustainability and humanitarian action? Although I admit that it has potential, one must also take into account the associated risks and ethical challenges. More balance is needed in the conversation.

The book offers insight. Challenges and risks are another conversation. Why not value both?

Does anyone else think that while AI can be beneficial for sustainability and humanitarian action, it could also be a double-edged sword? I see a future where AI is used for good, but could also be exploited for less noble purposes. What guarantees exist to avoid this?

Totally agree. Ethics in AI is essential to avoid its misuse.

Interesting article about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. But don't you think AI could be used incorrectly and cause more harm than good? If it is not properly regulated, who will prevent its misuse? Come on, not everything is rosy in the world of AI!

Totally agree, AI is a tool, not a savior. It depends on how we use it.

Is anyone else wondering if AI can really be used for social good as the book AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health suggests? I am concerned that this technology could be misused and instead of helping, it could make things worse. Could we fully trust AI for these delicate issues?

I understand your concerns, but AI is just a tool. It depends on who and how you use it.

Interesting article about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action and Health. But don't you think we should have more discussions about the ethics of AI? I mean, how do you ensure that this AI for good is not used for harmful purposes?

Do you really believe that AI can be totally beneficial? I can't help but think about the ethical implications of AI in health and humanitarian action. If everything is automated, what happens to humanity in all this? Are we not risking losing our essence?

AI does not take away our humanity, it expands our capabilities. Adapt or be left behind!

This article on Book: AI for Good left me thinking… Wouldn't it be more effective if AI developers focused on more tangible, less idealistic applications? Don't get me wrong, sustainability and humanitarian action are important topics, but wouldn't it be more practical to focus on how AI can improve our daily lives in practical and realistic ways?

What if improving our daily lives includes sustainability and humanitarian action? Isn't that tangible?

I just read this article about Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. Does anyone else feel like AI can be a double-edged sword? Yes, it can be useful for sustainability and humanitarian action. But it can also be misused, right? What do you think?

After reading this article on Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health, I wonder, to what extent can AI really contribute to human well-being without causing negative side effects? There is always a cost, right? Are we prepared for it?

Totally agree. AI has potential, but are we aware of its potential harms?

Don't you find it curious how artificial intelligence is being used for the good of humanity? After reading Book: AI for Good, it makes me wonder, couldn't we use these same AI applications to further improve our education or our political system? Imagine the possibilities!

Totally agree, AI could totally revolutionize our education and politics. It is time to act!

Interesting article about the Book: AI for Good: Applications in Sustainability, Humanitarian Action, and Health. But I wonder, how do they make sure that AI is really for good? Are there clear regulations on its use? Not all that glitters is gold, friends. We should question these advances more instead of simply assuming they are good.